Assistants that answer your customers
On WhatsApp, day or night. They answer what they can and hand the rest to a person, with the whole conversation attached.
Zahra, for StudentQR
We find the work AI can take off your team's plate, build it into how you already operate, and keep it running. Senior engineers from the first call to go-live.
30 minutes with the engineers, not a salesperson. We'll tell you if it's not a fit.
Ingest
Your data, your systems
Reason
Models under evaluation
Act
Into the tools you use
Running in production for
Six kinds of system we put into businesses. Every one of them is running today, for a client or for ourselves.
On WhatsApp, day or night. They answer what they can and hand the rest to a person, with the whole conversation attached.
Zahra, for StudentQR
Receipts, bank statements, even video. It pulls out what matters and fills in the forms nobody wants to type.
Books and PBLSH
Connect Claude or ChatGPT to your own data over MCP, and ask how sales went this month in plain words.
The Mantra
Updates, reminders and hand-offs between your tools, each drawn as a diagram, with an alert the moment a step fails.
Automator
Dashboards, approvals and internal tools, so the AI lands inside an app your team already opens every day.
The Mantra and SecureTrace
The AI drafts, someone approves. Anything that touches money, customers or records waits for a human yes.
Books and PBLSH

people on the support team
Zahra answers teachers day and night, and passes anything tricky to a person right inside their own WhatsApp.
Read the case study
THE MANTRAof bottles traced back to their batch
One app runs batches, stock, agents and commissions, and the owners simply ask Claude how business is going.
Read the case studytitle, description and tags for every clip
AI watches every video and writes its title, description and tags. A person approves with one click.
Read the case studyevery entry, straight from a photo of the receipt
Snap a receipt to Telegram and the entry is drafted. Bank lines match themselves. Only a person can post.
Read the case studyWe're building a team of AI agents where each one is great at a single job. A lead agent breaks your request down and hands every piece to the specialist who knows it best. Nothing leaves the squad without a person's OK.
Lead
Splits the job, hands it out
Support
Answers customers on WhatsApp
Working
Answer a customer asking where their order is
Analyst
Answers questions from your data
Working
Pull this month's sales by channel
Bookkeeper
Drafts entries, matches the bank
Working
Match 42 bank lines to the books
Ops
Runs workflows, fixes failures
Working
Re-run the delivery sync that failed at 3am
Reviewer
Checks every result against evals
Working
Check every draft before a person sees it
Content
Writes titles, tags and listings
Working
Tag the 18 video clips uploaded overnight
You
3 drafts ready for your OK
A preview of what we're building. The tasks are examples.
Every agent has its own instructions, tools and limits, like a new hire with a clear role.
It splits the work, routes each task, and brings the results back together.
Each specialist builds on a system we already have in production.
Anyone can wire up a model. What makes AI safe to hand real work is everything we build around it.
An eval suite runs on every change, so we know a tweak made things better before it ships.
An assistant that can request stock can't move stock or take money. Limits are part of the design.
Drafts wait for a person. Nothing is posted, sent or paid on the AI's word alone.
Each run is logged step by step, with an alert the moment one fails.
Claude, GPT, Gemini: we pick per task, and switch when a better one arrives.
It runs within your systems and security boundary, and your data isn't used to train anyone's model.
A receipt arrives on Telegram
Finds the new receipt
Reads it: vendor, date, total, tax
Picks the expense account
Saves a draft entry, not posted
The owner checks it and posts
A replay of one receipt through Books, with its real tool names. The receipt itself is an example.
No two-year roadmap. We pick one workflow that matters, get it live, then take the next, with the same team the whole way.
One week mapping where AI pays off in your operations, and saying plainly where it doesn't.
A working system in your stack, in front of real users, within six weeks.
We stay on, keep the first one sharp, and take on the next workflow.
The demo lands, everyone's impressed, and then nothing reaches the business. We're built for the hard part: getting AI into daily operations and keeping it there.
No account layer, no hand-off to juniors, no one learning on your budget. The senior engineers on your first call are the ones writing the code six weeks later.
We build inside your systems and your security boundary. Nothing to migrate, no new vendor to manage.
Every change ships behind an eval suite, so improvement is measured rather than claimed.
Models drift, workflows change, and real usage never matches the pilot. We stay on to keep the first system earning while the next one goes live — which is the whole difference between a transformation and a pilot.
No. Part of the first week is finding out what data you have and whether it's enough. If it isn't, we'll tell you what it would take before you spend anything on building.
Whichever does the job best for the cost: Claude, GPT, Gemini, or an open model you run yourself. Systems are built so the model can be swapped without rebuilding everything around it.
No. We use the providers' business terms, under which your data isn't used for training, and keep the system inside your own infrastructure wherever you need it there.
It's designed for that. Anything that matters waits for a person to approve, every step is logged, and a failed step raises an alert. Evals catch regressions before a change reaches you.
That's the point. WhatsApp, Telegram, your accounting system, spreadsheets, internal databases: we build into what your team uses rather than asking anyone to move.
On most first projects, a working system in front of real users within six weeks. Bigger ones are split up so something useful ships early.
It depends on the workflow, so we don't quote blind. After the first call you get a clear scope and price for the first phase, and an honest answer if it isn't worth doing.
Thirty minutes with the engineers who'd actually build it. You leave with an honest read on whether it's worth doing, what it would take, and what it would cost.